Skip to content
MN Fish Finder

East Bearskin

Cook County
Near Grand Marais
DOW: 16014600
Northern PikeExcellent · 79WalleyeGood · 67Hybrid SunfishGood · 55

A 593-acre lake near Grand Marais in Cook County — best known for pike and walleye. Last surveyed 2023.

Fish Species (12)

Northern Pike

Excellent · 79

Typical numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991

Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
6.75 lbs

Catch rate: 0.75 per gill net · typical 0.6–2.4 for a lake like this

Size of catchable northern pike83% keeper-size (24"+)
14–23" · 17%Largest sampled 36"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.6227.5"5.40 lbs
Jul 31, 20230.0827.5"3.41 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.6222.9"4.68 lbs

Walleye

Stocked 2022
Good · 67

Typical numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991

Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.64 lbs

Catch rate: 1.8 per gill net · typical 1.2–5.2 for a lake like this

Size of catchable walleye62% keeper-size (15"+)
10–14" · 38%Largest sampled 28"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Stocked with fry every other year · 1,230,000 fish total
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.2514.4"1.35 lbs
Jul 31, 20232.6214.4"1.62 lbs
Jul 31, 20230.2514.4"1.21 lbs
Stocking Details
YearSizeNumberPounds
2022fry300,0003.1
2021fry300,0002.9
2018fry300,0003.4
2017fry330,0003.1

Hybrid Sunfish

Good · 55

Typical numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020

Avg Size
3.0"
Avg Weight
0.04 lbs

Catch rate: 0.67 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.832.6"0.03 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.673.0"0.04 lbs

Smallmouth Bass

Good · 50

Large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
3.7"
Avg Weight
0.04 lbs

Catch rate: 1.5 per trap net

Size of catchable smallmouth bass33% keeper-size (12"+)
7–11" · 67%Largest sampled 13"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.623.7"0.40 lbs
Jul 31, 20231.503.7"0.04 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.1711.2"0.96 lbs

Black Crappie

Average · 48

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020

Avg Size
7.3"
Avg Weight
0.54 lbs

Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net · typical 0.1–0.4 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.176.0"0.15 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.127.3"0.15 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.177.3"0.54 lbs

Yellow Perch

Average · 46

Typical numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991

Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.11 lbs

Catch rate: 1.7 per gill net · typical 0.4–3.7 for a lake like this

Size of catchable yellow perch10% keeper-size (9"+)
5–8" · 90%Largest sampled 9"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20231.503.8"0.13 lbs
Jul 31, 20230.503.8"0.11 lbs
Jul 31, 20230.673.8"-

Pumpkinseed

Average · 38

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020

Avg Size
3.7"
Avg Weight
0.06 lbs

Catch rate: 1.8 per trap net · typical 0.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable pumpkinseed0% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 100%Largest sampled 6"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 3, 20201.833.7"0.06 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.253.7"0.17 lbs
Jul 18, 20160.173.0"0.05 lbs

Green Sunfish

Poor · 17

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020

Avg Size
4.0"
Avg Weight
0.06 lbs

Catch rate: 0.25 per trap net · typical 0.3–2.8 for a lake like this

Size of catchable green sunfish0% keeper-size (7"+)
3–6" · 100%Largest sampled 4"

Size from the Jul 2023 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.502.9"0.06 lbs
Jul 31, 20231.752.9"0.03 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.254.0"0.06 lbs

Largemouth Bass

Insufficient

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
3.4"
Avg Weight
0.06 lbs

Catch rate: 1.5 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20231.503.4"0.06 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.426.8"0.22 lbs
Jul 30, 20120.082.0"-

Lake Trout

Stocked 2021
Insufficient

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020

Avg Size
29.0"
Avg Weight
8.62 lbs

Catch rate: 0.25 per gill net

Stocked with yearlings irregularly · 10,697 fish total
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 3, 20200.2529.0"8.62 lbs
Jul 18, 20160.2528.0"8.32 lbs
Jul 30, 20120.2519.0"3.55 lbs
Stocking Details
YearSizeNumberPounds
2021yearlings5,720428.8
2019yearlings4,977496.6

Bluegill

Insufficient

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023

Avg Size
1.0"

Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.171.0"-
Jul 27, 19981.082.3"0.01 lbs
Other species in this lake (1)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

White Sucker

Good · 54

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991

Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
2.25 lbs

Catch rate: 1.4 per gill net · typical 0.8–5.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 31, 20230.5017.8"2.58 lbs
Aug 3, 20200.6218.2"2.67 lbs
Jul 18, 20160.3318.2"3.86 lbs

Biologist Notes

August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in East Bearskin?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Northern Pike, Walleye, Hybrid Sunfish, Smallmouth Bass, and Black Crappie in East Bearskin. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at East Bearskin?

Minnesota DNR records list public access for East Bearskin. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.

How deep is East Bearskin?

East Bearskin has a maximum depth of 66 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in East Bearskin last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in East Bearskin is from 2023.

Does East Bearskin have any invasive species?

No invasive species are on record for East Bearskin in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.

More lakes in Cook County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
593.29 acres
Max Depth
66 ft
Shoreline
13.71 mi
Public Access
Yes
View on DNR LakeFinder

Location

48.0427°N, 90.3634°W

Get Directions