East Bearskin
A 593-acre lake near Grand Marais in Cook County — best known for pike and walleye. Last surveyed 2023.
Fish Species (12)
Northern Pike
Typical numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991
Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 0.75 per gill net · typical 0.6–2.4 for a lake like this
Size from the Jul 2023 survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.62 | 27.5" | 5.40 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.08 | 27.5" | 3.41 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.62 | 22.9" | 4.68 lbs |
Walleye
Stocked 2022Typical numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991
Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 1.8 per gill net · typical 1.2–5.2 for a lake like this
Size from the Jul 2023 survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.25 | 14.4" | 1.35 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 2.62 | 14.4" | 1.62 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.25 | 14.4" | 1.21 lbs |
Stocking Details
| Year | Size | Number | Pounds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | fry | 300,000 | 3.1 |
| 2021 | fry | 300,000 | 2.9 |
| 2018 | fry | 300,000 | 3.4 |
| 2017 | fry | 330,000 | 3.1 |
Hybrid Sunfish
Typical numbers
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020
Catch rate: 0.67 per trap net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.83 | 2.6" | 0.03 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.67 | 3.0" | 0.04 lbs |
Smallmouth Bass
Large fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023
Catch rate: 1.5 per trap net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.62 | 3.7" | 0.40 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 1.50 | 3.7" | 0.04 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.17 | 11.2" | 0.96 lbs |
Black Crappie
Typical numbers · average-size fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020
Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net · typical 0.1–0.4 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.17 | 6.0" | 0.15 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.12 | 7.3" | 0.15 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.17 | 7.3" | 0.54 lbs |
Yellow Perch
Typical numbers · small fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991
Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 1.7 per gill net · typical 0.4–3.7 for a lake like this
Size from the Jul 2023 survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 1.50 | 3.8" | 0.13 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.50 | 3.8" | 0.11 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.67 | 3.8" | - |
Pumpkinseed
Above-normal numbers · small fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020
Catch rate: 1.8 per trap net · typical 0.5 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2020 | 1.83 | 3.7" | 0.06 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.25 | 3.7" | 0.17 lbs |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 0.17 | 3.0" | 0.05 lbs |
Green Sunfish
Below-normal numbers · small fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020
Catch rate: 0.25 per trap net · typical 0.3–2.8 for a lake like this
Size from the Jul 2023 survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.50 | 2.9" | 0.06 lbs |
| Jul 31, 2023 | 1.75 | 2.9" | 0.03 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.25 | 4.0" | 0.06 lbs |
Largemouth Bass
Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023
Catch rate: 1.5 per trap net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 1.50 | 3.4" | 0.06 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.42 | 6.8" | 0.22 lbs |
| Jul 30, 2012 | 0.08 | 2.0" | - |
Lake Trout
Stocked 2021Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2020
Catch rate: 0.25 per gill net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.25 | 29.0" | 8.62 lbs |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 0.25 | 28.0" | 8.32 lbs |
| Jul 30, 2012 | 0.25 | 19.0" | 3.55 lbs |
Stocking Details
| Year | Size | Number | Pounds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | yearlings | 5,720 | 428.8 |
| 2019 | yearlings | 4,977 | 496.6 |
Bluegill
Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2023
Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.17 | 1.0" | - |
| Jul 27, 1998 | 1.08 | 2.3" | 0.01 lbs |
Other species in this lake (1)
Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.
White Sucker
Typical numbers · average-size fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1991
Last surveyed 1991 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 1.4 per gill net · typical 0.8–5.3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 | 0.50 | 17.8" | 2.58 lbs |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 0.62 | 18.2" | 2.67 lbs |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 0.33 | 18.2" | 3.86 lbs |
Biologist Notes
August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…
Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.
August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…
Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.
August 6, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the qu…
Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in East Bearskin Lake on August 6th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Lake Trout, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Lake Trout require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 65.6 feet), the water temperature decreased below 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) at 59.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 57.2 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Lake Trout. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 8.9 degrees C (48.0 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 8.8 degrees C (47.8 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Lake Trout at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 9 years, between 1956-2023, indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2024. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Lake Trout are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What fish can you catch in East Bearskin?
Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Northern Pike, Walleye, Hybrid Sunfish, Smallmouth Bass, and Black Crappie in East Bearskin. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.
Is there public access at East Bearskin?
Minnesota DNR records list public access for East Bearskin. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.
How deep is East Bearskin?
East Bearskin has a maximum depth of 66 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.
When were the main sport fish in East Bearskin last surveyed?
The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in East Bearskin is from 2023.
Does East Bearskin have any invasive species?
No invasive species are on record for East Bearskin in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.
More lakes in Cook County
View allLake Details
- Surface Area
- 593.29 acres
- Max Depth
- 66 ft
- Shoreline
- 13.71 mi
- Public Access
- Yes