Skip to content
MN Fish Finder

Horseshoe

Crow Wing County
Near Cross Lake
DOW: 18025100
Largemouth BassExcellent · 91Hybrid SunfishExcellent · 90Northern PikeGood · 68

A 922-acre lake near Cross Lake in Crow Wing County — best known for bass and panfish. Last surveyed 2022.

Fish Species (18)

Largemouth Bass

Excellent · 91

Above-normal numbers · large fish

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
12.7"
Avg Weight
1.31 lbs

Catch rate: 94.5 · Electrofishing survey

Size of catchable largemouth bass65% keeper-size (12"+)
8–11" · 35%Largest sampled 19"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20224.0012.7"1.43 lbs
Aug 8, 202294.5312.7"1.31 lbs
Aug 8, 20220.8312.7"1.62 lbs

Hybrid Sunfish

Excellent · 90

Above-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
7.1"
Avg Weight
0.33 lbs

Catch rate: 1.6 per trap net

Size of catchable hybrid sunfish67% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 33%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20221.587.1"0.33 lbs
Aug 8, 20222.587.1"0.51 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.14--

Northern Pike

Good · 68

Above-normal numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
19.3"
Avg Weight
1.92 lbs

Catch rate: 9.7 per gill net · typical 3.5–8.9 for a lake like this

Size of catchable northern pike21% keeper-size (24"+)
14–23" · 79%Largest sampled 33"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20221.0819.3"2.05 lbs
Aug 8, 20229.6719.3"1.92 lbs
Aug 1, 20221.31--

Rock Bass

Good · 68

Typical numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
7.0"
Avg Weight
0.36 lbs

Catch rate: 0.67 per trap net · typical 0.4–1.7 for a lake like this

Size of catchable rock bass50% keeper-size (8"+)
4–7" · 50%Largest sampled 8"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20220.677.0"0.36 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.36--
Aug 1, 20220.65--

Walleye

Good · 67

Typical numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
23.6"
Avg Weight
4.94 lbs

Catch rate: 0.83 per gill net · typical 0.5–2.3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable walleye100% keeper-size (15"+)
All keeper-sizeLargest sampled 27"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20220.8323.6"4.94 lbs
Aug 8, 20220.7023.6"5.86 lbs
Aug 8, 20161.2522.1"4.05 lbs

Black Crappie

Good · 57

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
8.0"
Avg Weight
0.37 lbs

Catch rate: 2.6 per trap net · typical 0.8–4 for a lake like this

Size of catchable black crappie17% keeper-size (10"+)
5–9" · 83%Largest sampled 11"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20222.588.0"0.37 lbs
Aug 8, 20221.338.0"0.35 lbs
Aug 8, 20161.927.4"0.29 lbs

Bluegill

Average · 25

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
5.2"
Avg Weight
0.13 lbs

Catch rate: 9.8 per trap net · typical 9.5–57.3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable bluegill3% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 97%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20229.835.2"0.13 lbs
Aug 8, 202214.005.2"0.16 lbs
Aug 1, 202234.21--

Yellow Perch

Poor · 20

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
6.0"
Avg Weight
0.08 lbs

Catch rate: 0.92 per gill net · typical 1–10.3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable yellow perch0% keeper-size (9"+)
5–8" · 100%Largest sampled 7"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20220.926.0"0.08 lbs
Aug 1, 20229.36--
Aug 1, 20223.27--

Pumpkinseed

Poor · 6

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
4.5"
Avg Weight
0.13 lbs

Catch rate: 0.42 per trap net · typical 1.5–6.8 for a lake like this

Size of catchable pumpkinseed0% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 100%Largest sampled 6"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20220.424.5"0.13 lbs
Aug 8, 20220.584.5"0.12 lbs
Aug 1, 20221.71--

Smallmouth Bass

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 2.0 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 9, 20102.00--
Aug 5, 19960.106.0"0.10 lbs
Other species in this lake (8)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

Golden Shiner

Good · 50

Large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
6.0"
Avg Weight
0.11 lbs

Catch rate: 0.08 per trap net · typical 0.1–0.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20220.086.0"0.11 lbs
Aug 5, 19910.10-0.05 lbs
Aug 10, 19870.10--

Yellow Bullhead

Average · 49

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
10.8"
Avg Weight
0.97 lbs

Catch rate: 1.2 per trap net · typical 2.7–13.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20221.1710.8"0.97 lbs
Aug 8, 202242.2510.8"0.83 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.07--

Brown Bullhead

Average · 39

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2010

Last surveyed 2010 — treat with caution

Avg Size
13.6"
Avg Weight
1.25 lbs

Catch rate: 0.09 per trap net · typical 0.6–2.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 8, 20221.6712.3"1.14 lbs
Aug 8, 20160.0814.0"1.43 lbs
Aug 9, 20101.1713.6"1.44 lbs

White Sucker

Average · 39

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 1996

Last surveyed 1996 — treat with caution

Avg Size
18.0"
Avg Weight
2.76 lbs

Catch rate: 0.11 per gill net · typical 0.3–1.7 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 9, 20100.0921.0"4.44 lbs
Aug 5, 19960.1118.0"2.76 lbs
Aug 5, 19850.33-2.77 lbs

Black Bullhead

Poor · 13

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 0.1 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 10, 19870.10--

Bluntnose Minnow

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Catch rate: 7.2 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20227.21--
Aug 1, 20220.65--
Aug 9, 201010.44--

Johnny Darter

Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Catch rate: 1.3 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.31--
Aug 1, 20220.57--
Aug 9, 20100.44--

Iowa Darter

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Catch rate: 1.5 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20223.27--
Aug 1, 20221.50--
Aug 9, 20102.27--

Biologist Notes

August 8, 2022Walleye were last stocked in 2010 and most of the fish caught appear to be from that stocking. While it may appear that Walleye numbers were low at 0.…

Walleye were last stocked in 2010 and most of the fish caught appear to be from that stocking. While it may appear that Walleye numbers were low at 0.8/gill net, it is average for this type of lake. Average length was 24.0" and all the fish were over 20" in length. Northern Pike numbers were above average for the fourth survey in a row at 9.7/gill net. Average length was 19.6" with 17% measuring at least 26.0" in length. Yellow Perch have been caught in low numbers since 1989. This trend continues with a gill net catch of 0.9/net. Fish stocked in 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2019 haven't seemed to help the situation for this important forage fish. Average length was 6.5". Largemouth Bass were sampled by night electrofishing, yielding a catch of 93.1/hr. run-time. Size was good, with an average of 13.3" and 64% measuring 12.0" or larger. Largemouth Bass were sampled in high numbers in gill nets at 4.0/net. Average length was 13.3", with 65% at least 12.0" in length. Panfish may be an attractive feature for Horseshoe anglers. Black Crappie numbers were average in gill nets (1.3/net) and in trap nets (2.6/net). Average length was 8.3" in gill nets and 8.6" in trap nets. With both gears combined, 57% of the fish were 8.0" or larger. Bluegill numbers, while the lowest to date at 9.8/trap net, were still average for this type of lake. Average size was 5.2" and 18% of the fish were 7.0" or larger. One trend we were seeing over the years was the increasing number of Yellow Bullheads. After six straight surveys with increasing numbers and peaking in 2013 at 103.3/gill net the trend has been for decreasing numbers the last two surveys. The gill net catch of 42.3/net was still well above average compared to similar lakes. Average length was 11.3". Zebra Mussels are present in Horseshoe Lake. Before and after launching lake users are required to inspect and remove any aquatic plants and animals from their watercraft and trailers as well as pull the plug and drain all water from the watercraft, including bilges, livewells and baitwells.

August 1, 2022A targeted survey of nearshore fish species in Horseshoe Lake was conducted on August 1st, 2022 by Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) Program Staff.…

A targeted survey of nearshore fish species in Horseshoe Lake was conducted on August 1st, 2022 by Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) Program Staff. Fourteen sampling sites were evenly spaced around the lake and each was sampled by backpack electrofishing and seining with a 50-foot seine. Nearshore sampling captured 18 species of fish including five species that are intolerant of disturbance (i.e., Banded Killifish, Blackchin Shiner, Blacknose Shiner, Iowa Darter, and Rock Bass) and no species that are tolerant of disturbance. The nearshore data were combined with trap net and gill net data from an August 2022 survey to describe the fish community and provide a Fish-based IBI (FIBI) score. The FIBI uses fish community data to measure a lake's health, and the types of fish species present can help identify any stressors that may be negatively affecting the lake environment. In Minnesota lakes, certain fish species cannot survive without clean water and a healthy habitat (e.g., Blackchin Shiner, Iowa Darter, and Rock Bass), while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions (e.g., Green Sunfish). The FIBI score, composed of several fish community diversity and composition metrics, indicates the overall health of a lake by comparing it to what is expected for a healthy lake. For additional information on the FIBI, search for "lake index of biological integrity" on the mndnr.gov website. Data from this survey indicates Horseshoe Lake is in good health as indicated by an FIBI score above the impairment threshold for aquatic life use determined for similar lakes. Data from this survey will contribute biological information about the health of the fish community to the Pine River Watershed assessment process in coordination with MN Pollution Control Agency. Minnesota DNR Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Program staff also assessed lakeshore habitat on Horseshoe Lake on June 6th, 2022, following the Score the Shore survey protocols. The assessment consisted of 62 survey sites evenly spaced 200 meters around the lake. Assessments were made in three habitat zones: Shoreline Zone (the shore-water interface to the top of the natural bank), Shoreland Zone (land-ward from shoreline to development structure or 100 feet), and Aquatic Zone (lake-ward 50 feet of shoreline). The average lakewide habitat score was 57.8 (±3.2) out of 100 possible, which is low and below the statewide average score of 73. A low score indicates that sites are typically developed and have a lower than expected amount of natural habitat. Approximately 91% of the sites were developed with a mean score of 54.2 (±3.0), while undeveloped sites had a mean score of 98.7 (±1.3). Minnesota DNR Fisheries IBI program staff delineated the floating leaf and emergent aquatic vegetation of Horseshoe Lake 8/31/2022, following the protocols listed in the MN DNR Lake Plant Mapping Manual. There was a total of 39.5 acres of floating and emergent plants mapped. This consisted of 35.8 acres of emergent dominated plant communities and 3.7 acres of floating leaf plant communities. The following taxa were noted during the survey: bulrush (round-stem group) (Schoenoplectus spp.), canary grass (Phalaris spp.), cattail (Typha spp.), sedge (Carex spp.), three-square bulrush (species) (Schoenoplectus pungens), watershield (Brasenia schreberi), white waterlily (Nymphaea odorata).

August 8, 2016We continue to attempt to improve the Horseshoe Lake (aka Sandbar) fishery. Northern pike and yellow bullhead numbers remained high, while yellow perc…

We continue to attempt to improve the Horseshoe Lake (aka Sandbar) fishery. Northern pike and yellow bullhead numbers remained high, while yellow perch and walleye numbers remained low. Crappie and largemouth bass are themost attractive fishery species according to our sampling. Walleye were last stocked in 2010, and most, if not all of the fish caught in 2016 appear to be from that stocking. While it appears that walleye numbers were low at 1.3/gill net, it is actually average for this type of lake. Possible solutions to improving the walleye situation could be reducing the northern pike population and increasing the yellow perch population as mentioned above. Average size of the fish caught in 2016 was 22.5" and all of the fish were over 19". Northern pike numbers were above average (9.4/gill net) for the third survey in a row. Average size was 20.5" and 13% were 24" or larger. Statewide zone pike regulations to be implemented in 2018 are designed to gradually improve over-abundant pike populations. Yellow perch have been caught in low numbers since 1989. This trend continued in 2016 with only 0.2/gill net (2 fish total). Fish stocked in 2009, 2010, and 2013 haven't seemed to help the situation for this important forage fish. Largemouth bass were sampled by night electrofishing, yielding a catch of 41.9/hr. run-time. While numbers may not have been as high as other lakes, size was good, with an average of 13.8" and 77% measuring 12" or larger. Fish up to 20.2" were captured. Panfish size may be an attractive feature for Horseshoe anglers. Black crappie numbers were average (1.9/gill net), with 48% of the fish measuring 8" or larger. Fish up to 10.8" were sampled. Bluegill numbers, while the lowest to date (14.7/trap net), were still average for this type of lake. Average size was 6.5" and 37% of the fish were 7" or larger. One trend we have seen over the years is the increasing number of yellow bullheads. After six straight surveys with increasing numbers and as many as 103.3/gill net in 2013, numbers finally went down this year to 61.6/gill net. Fish ranged from 5.9" to 13.5" with an average size of 10.9".

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Horseshoe?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Largemouth Bass, Hybrid Sunfish, Northern Pike, Rock Bass, and Walleye in Horseshoe. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Horseshoe?

Minnesota DNR records list public access for Horseshoe. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.

How deep is Horseshoe?

Horseshoe has a maximum depth of 56 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Horseshoe last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Horseshoe is from 2022.

Does Horseshoe have any invasive species?

Yes — Horseshoe has confirmed zebra mussel. Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to avoid spreading invasives to other waters.

More lakes in Crow Wing County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
922.03 acres
Max Depth
56 ft
Shoreline
7.62 mi
Public Access
Yes
View on DNR LakeFinder

Invasive Species Alert

  • zebra mussel

Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to prevent spread.

Location

46.5819°N, 94.1152°W

Get Directions