Skip to content
MN Fish Finder

Jay Gould

Itasca County
Near Cohasset
DOW: 31056500
WalleyeExcellent · 82Black CrappieGood · 66Northern PikeGood · 62

A 552-acre lake near Cohasset in Itasca County — best known for walleye and panfish. Last surveyed 2022.

Fish Species (18)

Walleye

Excellent · 82

Above-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
16.0"
Avg Weight
1.65 lbs

Catch rate: 3.1 per gill net · typical 0.5–3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable walleye52% keeper-size (15"+)
10–14" · 48%Largest sampled 24"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.2516.0"3.61 lbs
Aug 1, 20223.1216.0"1.65 lbs
May 28, 20190.06--

Black Crappie

Good · 66

Typical numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
9.4"
Avg Weight
0.55 lbs

Catch rate: 1.1 per gill net · typical 1–4.8 for a lake like this

Size of catchable black crappie55% keeper-size (10"+)
5–9" · 45%Largest sampled 12"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.129.4"0.55 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.259.4"0.74 lbs
May 28, 20190.768.9"0.51 lbs

Northern Pike

Good · 62

Typical numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
19.9"
Avg Weight
2.30 lbs

Catch rate: 6.3 per gill net · typical 4.8–12.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable northern pike26% keeper-size (24"+)
14–23" · 74%Largest sampled 35"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.8819.9"1.87 lbs
Aug 1, 20226.2519.9"2.30 lbs
May 28, 20190.71--

Yellow Perch

Good · 59

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
6.2"
Avg Weight
0.12 lbs

Catch rate: 49.5 per gill net · typical 2–21.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable yellow perch4% keeper-size (9"+)
5–8" · 96%Largest sampled 10"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 202249.506.2"0.12 lbs
Aug 1, 20221.126.2"0.13 lbs
May 28, 20191.18--

Rock Bass

Good · 52

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
8.1"
Avg Weight
0.88 lbs

Catch rate: 0.12 per trap net · typical 0.5–1.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable rock bass63% keeper-size (8"+)
4–7" · 37%Largest sampled 10"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.128.1"0.88 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.888.1"0.55 lbs
May 28, 20193.47--

Largemouth Bass

Good · 52

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2015

Last surveyed 2015 — treat with caution

Avg Size
11.8"
Avg Weight
1.84 lbs

Catch rate: 23.5 · Electrofishing survey

Size of catchable largemouth bass22% keeper-size (12"+)
8–11" · 78%Largest sampled 15"

Size from the Aug 2022 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.1210.2"0.84 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.1210.2"0.34 lbs
Aug 3, 201523.4811.8"1.84 lbs

Bluegill

Average · 41

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
4.9"
Avg Weight
0.12 lbs

Catch rate: 7.4 per trap net · typical 8.3–50.1 for a lake like this

Size of catchable bluegill13% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 87%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20223.124.9"0.28 lbs
Aug 1, 20227.384.9"0.12 lbs
May 28, 201923.477.2"0.40 lbs

Hybrid Sunfish

Average · 36

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
6.7"
Avg Weight
0.34 lbs

Catch rate: 0.38 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.386.7"0.34 lbs
May 28, 20190.067.0"0.44 lbs

Muskellunge

Average · 31

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 1997

Last surveyed 1997 — treat with caution

Avg Size
28.0"
Avg Weight
4.40 lbs

Catch rate: 0.12 per gill net · typical 0.3–1.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 19970.1228.0"4.40 lbs

Pumpkinseed

Average · 26

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
4.8"
Avg Weight
0.16 lbs

Catch rate: 3.0 per trap net · typical 2.8–10.3 for a lake like this

Size of catchable pumpkinseed3% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 97%Largest sampled 8"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20226.384.8"0.16 lbs
Aug 1, 20223.004.8"0.16 lbs
May 28, 20196.186.5"0.29 lbs

Smallmouth Bass

Average · 26

Below-normal numbers

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2007

Last surveyed 2007 — treat with caution

Avg Size
15.5"
Avg Weight
2.17 lbs

Catch rate: 1.8 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.1214.0"1.58 lbs
Aug 6, 20071.7515.5"2.17 lbs
Aug 4, 19970.124.4"1.65 lbs

Green Sunfish

Insufficient

Trap-net survey · surveyed May 2019

Avg Size
4.0"
Avg Weight
0.06 lbs

Catch rate: 0.06 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
May 28, 20190.064.0"0.06 lbs
Other species in this lake (6)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

White Sucker

Good · 55

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
15.5"
Avg Weight
1.91 lbs

Catch rate: 1.4 per gill net · typical 0.5–2.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20221.3815.5"1.91 lbs
Aug 3, 20150.4416.5"2.18 lbs
Aug 6, 20071.5618.0"2.85 lbs

Black Bullhead

Good · 50

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1990

Last surveyed 1990 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.87 lbs

Catch rate: 0.38 per trap net · typical 0.5–5.7 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 30, 19900.38-0.87 lbs
Jul 30, 199012.57-0.87 lbs

Brown Bullhead

Average · 47

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 1997

Last surveyed 1997 — treat with caution

Avg Size
12.9"
Avg Weight
1.03 lbs

Catch rate: 0.33 per trap net · typical 0.5–3.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.3810.3"0.84 lbs
May 28, 20190.24--
Aug 3, 20150.3314.0"1.81 lbs

Shorthead Redhorse

Average · 45

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
20.3"
Avg Weight
3.57 lbs

Catch rate: 0.38 per gill net · typical 0.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.3820.3"3.57 lbs
Aug 3, 20150.4420.3"3.22 lbs
Aug 6, 20071.2218.4"2.53 lbs

Yellow Bullhead

Average · 45

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022

Avg Size
11.3"
Avg Weight
1.22 lbs

Catch rate: 0.62 per trap net · typical 2.1–10.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 1, 20220.6211.3"1.22 lbs
Aug 1, 20220.7511.3"0.94 lbs
May 28, 20191.29--

Johnny Darter

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Aug 1997

Last surveyed 1997 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 0.67 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Aug 4, 19970.67--

Biologist Notes

August 6, 2025Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Jay Gould Lake on August 6th, 2025, to evaluate the quanti…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Jay Gould Lake on August 6th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 32.8 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 17.3 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 16.7 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 21.8 degrees C (71.2 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Cisco at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 4 years, between 2007-2023, indicate suitable, yet marginal, oxythermal habitat in years surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2022 when the suitable oxythermal habitat layer was 0.2 feet thick. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 6, 2025Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Jay Gould Lake on August 6th, 2025, to evaluate the quanti…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Jay Gould Lake on August 6th, 2025, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 32.8 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 17.3 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 16.7 feet at the time of sampling. Therefore, the water column did not contain a layer of water with sufficient temperature and dissolved oxygen for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 21.8 degrees C (71.2 degrees F). TDO3 values warmer than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were unsuitable for Cisco at the time of the survey. Data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 4 years, between 2007-2023, indicate suitable, yet marginal, oxythermal habitat in years surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2022 when the suitable oxythermal habitat layer was 0.2 feet thick. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 7, 2023A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Jay Gould Lake on August 7, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygena…

A temperature-dissolved oxygen profile was collected in the deepest basin on Jay Gould Lake on August 7, 2023, to evaluate the amount of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee. Based on the profile, the top of the thermocline (i.e., the location in the water column with the sharpest transition from warm to cold water) occurred at approximately 13 feet. Dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L at 19 feet, which was within the thermocline, at the time of sampling. The temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to below 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 18.1°C (64.6°F). TDO3 values cooler than 21.5°C indicate that oxythermal conditions are favorable for Cisco. Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the thermocline indicate that suitable oxythermal habitat for Cisco was available across a range of depths at the time of sampling during the summer of 2023. Data collected in 1974-2015 indicate suitable oxythermal habitat in most years, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 1990. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and therefore experience higher levels of stress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Jay Gould?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Walleye, Black Crappie, Northern Pike, Yellow Perch, and Rock Bass in Jay Gould. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Jay Gould?

Minnesota DNR records list public access for Jay Gould. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.

How deep is Jay Gould?

Jay Gould has a maximum depth of 33 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Jay Gould last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Jay Gould is from 2022.

Does Jay Gould have any invasive species?

Yes — Jay Gould has confirmed zebra mussel. Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to avoid spreading invasives to other waters.

More lakes in Itasca County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
551.74 acres
Max Depth
33 ft
Shoreline
7.38 mi
Public Access
Yes
View on DNR LakeFinder

Invasive Species Alert

  • zebra mussel

Clean, drain, and dry your equipment to prevent spread.

Location

47.2452°N, 93.6325°W

Get Directions