Amber
A 182-acre lake near Fairmont in McLeod County — best known for catfish and walleye. Last surveyed 2022.
Fish Species (18)
Channel Catfish
Above-normal numbers
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 4.5 per gill net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 4.50 | 16.9" | 2.01 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.67 | 16.9" | 1.26 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 1.33 | 19.8" | 2.50 lbs |
Walleye
Typical numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 2.5 per gill net · typical 1.2–6.3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 1.89 | 15.5" | 1.92 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 2.50 | 15.5" | 0.99 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.50 | 14.7" | 1.37 lbs |
Bluegill
Typical numbers · large fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 13.9 per trap net · typical 7.5–62.5 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 13.89 | 7.2" | 0.37 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.56 | 6.8" | 0.34 lbs |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 14.15 | - | - |
Northern Pike
Below-normal numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 1993
Last surveyed 1993 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 1.4 per gill net · typical 1.5–7.3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | 0.11 | 32.0" | 7.39 lbs |
| Aug 15, 2005 | 0.12 | 27.0" | 4.85 lbs |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 0.22 | 21.0" | 2.16 lbs |
Black Crappie
Typical numbers · average-size fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 9.9 per trap net · typical 1.8–21.2 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 9.89 | 8.8" | 0.46 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 7.00 | 8.8" | 0.50 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 1.50 | 8.3" | 0.40 lbs |
Yellow Perch
Typical numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 2.5 per gill net · typical 2–27.9 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 2.50 | 8.3" | 0.36 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.11 | 8.3" | 0.28 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.89 | 5.8" | 0.12 lbs |
White Crappie
Typical numbers · average-size fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 0.78 per trap net · typical 0.5–6.6 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.50 | 8.6" | 0.23 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.78 | 8.6" | 0.52 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.11 | 7.0" | 0.22 lbs |
Green Sunfish
Below-normal numbers · small fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 1997
Last surveyed 1997 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 0.11 per trap net · typical 0.2–1.3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018 | 3.14 | - | - |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 0.11 | 3.0" | 0.06 lbs |
Hybrid Sunfish
Below-normal numbers
Trap-net survey · surveyed Apr 1982
Last surveyed 1982 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 0.06 per trap net
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1982 | 0.06 | - | 0.25 lbs |
Largemouth Bass
Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 1993
Last surveyed 1993 — treat with caution
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.33 | 12.3" | 2.08 lbs |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 11.00 | - | - |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 0.14 | - | - |
Other species in this lake (8)
Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.
Common Carp
Above-normal numbers · average-size fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 6.0 per gill net · typical 0.3–3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 18.67 | 13.5" | 1.28 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 6.00 | 13.5" | 3.70 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 2.00 | 23.3" | 5.34 lbs |
Freshwater Drum
Above-normal numbers · average-size fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 49.5 per gill net · typical 4–32.3 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 49.50 | 10.8" | 0.57 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 8.56 | 10.8" | 0.68 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 1.67 | 9.1" | 0.52 lbs |
Golden Shiner
Typical numbers · large fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 1993
Last surveyed 1993 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 0.6 per gill net · typical 0.3–1.5 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2001 | 0.11 | 5.0" | 0.08 lbs |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 0.56 | 5.6" | 0.08 lbs |
| Aug 30, 1993 | 0.60 | 6.3" | 0.11 lbs |
White Sucker
Typical numbers · average-size fish
Gill-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 0.5 per gill net · typical 0.4–2.2 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.22 | 15.0" | 1.51 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.50 | 15.0" | 1.78 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.78 | 15.6" | 1.50 lbs |
Black Bullhead
Below-normal numbers · large fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 0.11 per trap net · typical 0.7–25.7 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 6.00 | 10.0" | 0.67 lbs |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.11 | 10.0" | 0.60 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 28.50 | 8.9" | 0.41 lbs |
Yellow Bullhead
Below-normal numbers · small fish
Trap-net survey · surveyed Aug 2022
Catch rate: 0.56 per trap net · typical 0.9–5.7 for a lake like this
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | 0.56 | 9.0" | 0.47 lbs |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 0.22 | 10.0" | 0.57 lbs |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 4.72 | - | - |
Fathead Minnow
Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2018
Last surveyed 2018 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 12.6 · Electrofishing survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018 | 12.58 | - | - |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 0.50 | - | - |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 41.33 | - | - |
Johnny Darter
Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2018
Last surveyed 2018 — treat with caution
Catch rate: 7.9 · Electrofishing survey
Survey History
| Date | Catch Rate | Avg Length | Avg Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018 | 0.50 | - | - |
| Jul 5, 2018 | 7.86 | - | - |
| Aug 25, 1997 | 0.33 | - | - |
Biologist Notes
August 22, 2022Amber Lake is a 180 acre lake with a max depth of 19 feet and 108 acres of littoral zone (15 feet or less). Amber Lake is part of the "Fairmont Chain…
Amber Lake is a 180 acre lake with a max depth of 19 feet and 108 acres of littoral zone (15 feet or less). Amber Lake is part of the "Fairmont Chain of Lakes" and is within the city limits of Fairmont. The Fairmont Chain of Lakes (from headwaters to mouth) is comprised of Amber Lake, Hall Lake, Budd Lake, Sisseton Lake, and George Lake which are natural impoundments of Center Creek in the Blue Earth River Watershed. A dam built on George Lake 1939 increased water storage and depth of each lake. Dredging in the 1970's to early 1990's also increased the depth of Budd and Hall Lakes. Amber Lake is the first lake and one of the deepest of the lakes with a watershed-to-lake ratio of 59 to 1 indicating a large influence of the watershed effects in the lake. The watershed has many factors that contribute to degraded conditions within Amber Lake. Agriculture and municipal sources of pollution are both present within the watershed. Many miles of agricultural tile move nutrient rich water to Amber Lake without wetland treatment and the city of Fairmont operates a storm water runoff system that empties roadway drainage into the lakes. These are the same lakes that the city of Fairmont draws drinking water (Budd Lake directly downstream), so it is imperative to reduce negative influences of water impairments to improve the water quality in the Fairmont Chain of Lakes. Amber Lake is managed primarily for Walleye and Muskellunge while Yellow Perch, Black Crappie and Bluegill are managed secondarily. Fish population assessments have been conducted every 4 to 7 years since 1982 with an initial assessment conducted in 1971. A recent fish population assessment was conducted during the week of August 22, 2022 to analyze the current species composition in Hall Lake and to determine changes in the fish community. Fish community changes over time tell us a lot about the health of an aquatic environment. During the fish assessment, water quality in Amber Lake was poor due to a heavy algae bloom. The algae bloom contained blue-green algae and surface water pH (9.25) was higher than Western Corn Belt Plain lakes (8.3-9.0). When pH is high, it is a result of a chemical process of blue-green algae photosynthesis in the upper part of the water column and causes alkaline water that can affect fish gills. This can have detrimental consequences to the fish community by forcing them to deeper depths. However, the deeper water, during an algae bloom, is often characterized by low dissolved oxygen. At the time of the survey dissolved oxygen was below 5.0 ppm (considered stressful to fish) as depths increased to greater than 12 feet. The combination of higher pH at the surface and lower dissolved oxygen at greater depths puts fish into a "squeeze" by forcing them to the middle of the water column. As the bloom continues to progress, this squeeze can be very stressful and/or result in water that is inadequate to sustain life if the bloom occurs over a long period of time. The final result can trigger a summerkill of fish, particularly those sensitive to low dissolved oxygen such as Walleye, Crappies, Yellow Perch, Muskellunge, and Bluegill. Fortunately, Amber Lake did not experience a summerkill and water quality improved shortly after the algae bloom. Since Walleye are the primary species of management, they are most important to track in Amber Lake. Since 1993, Walleye have been at or below the long-term gill net catch rate average of 3 per gillnet. In 2022, the catch rate was 2.5 per gillnet while the trap net catch rate was 1.9 per trap net. The gill net and trap net catch rates both increased from 2018, when the gill net catch was 0.5 per net and the trap net catch was 1 per net. Lower Mississippi Strain (LMS, Lake Sarah egg take) Walleye fry were stocked in Amber Lake in 2019, 2021, and 2022. Additionally, 2,214 fingerling Walleye (Upper Mississippi River Strain) were stocked in 2019. Walleye in the gill net and trap net sample ranged in length from 6.6 to 26.3 inches with 4 different ages (Ages 1-4). Three of the 4 year age groups present were from years where LMS Walleye fry were stocked, indicating that LMS Walleye are establishing well each year. Average size of Walleye in the sample was good with more than 50% of the fish over 15 inches. Health of each fish appeared good too. Therefore, the Walleye population appears to be doing well and potentially increasing in abundance due to a change in stocking strategy utilizing LMS Walleye fry. Angling for Walleye has been good in Amber Lake since 2020 and should continue with most fish at a harvestable size. Muskellunge have been managed in Amber Lake and the entire Fairmont Chain of Lakes since 2016. Muskie fingerling have been stocked in even years with 314 fingerling in each year, except 2020 due to Covid related shutdown of spring egg take operations. To make up for the missed stocking in 2020, the Fairmont Chain of Lakes was stocked in 2021. No Muskies were sampled during netting in Amber Lake in 2022, but reports from anglers indicate that the original stocking in 2016 was successful and Muskies near 40 inches have been reported. One 37 inch Muskie was sampled in a trap net on Hall Lake during the summer of 2022. A large frame trap net survey will be conducted on the Fairmont Chain of Lakes in 2024 with recapture surveys in 2025 and 2026 (if necessary). Continued Muskie management will help to add a consistent top predator to Amber Lake and the Fairmont Chain that historically was missing within the Chain of Lakes. Yellow Perch relative abundance has been less than the long-term gill net catch rate of 15.9 since 1982 except 2011 when the catch rate was 39.0 per gill net. In 2022 the catch rate was 2.5 per gill net. Yellow Perch in the sample ranged in length from 8 to just under 10 inches. Yellow Perch have not been stocked into Amber Lake. They are self-sustaining, but potentially limited by habitat degradation due to low aquatic plant and woody debris abundance. Additionally recently illegally introduced Yellow Bass in 2013 have now taken hold in Amber Lake and could be occupying a similar niche and potentially exclude Yellow Perch to some degree. Continued monitoring is necessary and potential stocking may be warranted in the future. Black Crappie have exhibited a different trend, compared to Yellow Perch, since 1987. Generally, the relative abundance of Black Crappie has remained above or near the long-term gill net average of 6.7 per net. Since 1987, 5 out of 7 fish assessments have had Black Crappie relative abundance near or exceeding the long-term average of just under 19 per trap net. More impressive is an increase in size structure of Black Crappie since 1997. Currently, 100% of the fish in the sample were over 7.9 inches. Black Crappie ranged in length from just under 8 to nearly 12.5 inches with an average length of 9.4 inches in the trap net sample. Health of Black Crappie was above average with many plump fish. Overall, Black Crappie have been resilient in the Fairmont Chain of Lakes. Black Crappie are able to thrive in degraded aquatic systems and can spawn without aquatic vegetation or woody debris. Angling for Black Crappie should remain good in the Fairmont Chain of Lakes particularly if Yellow Bass don't become a nuisance while fishing for crappie. A bright spot in the Amber Lake fish community is Bluegill abundance. Bluegill were caught in trap nets at a rate of 13.9 per net, the greatest catch rate ever observed in Amber Lake. Bluegill ranged from nearly 4 inches to just over 9 inches with a mean length in the 7 to 8 inch range. Overall body condition of each fish was excellent indicating ample food exists. All signs point to excellent angling for Bluegill which will provide a unique opportunity in Amber Lake over the next several years. With an average length approaching 8 inches, many harvestable Bluegill should be available. Other species sampled in Amber Lake were Bigmouth Buffalo, Black Bullhead, Channel Catfish, Common Carp, Freshwater Drum, Largemouth Bass, Quillback Carpsucker, White Crappie, White Sucker, Yellow Bass, and Yellow Bullhead. These species, except Yellow Bass, are typical residents of degraded aquatic lakes. Channel Catfish and Freshwater Drum have been the most abundant of the species listed since the early 1990's. Increases in Channel Catfish and Freshwater Drum relative abundance can lead to competition with Walleye, Yellow Perch, and even Black Crappie. However, it appears that Yellow Perch are the most affected. Interestingly, Common Carp relative abundance has generally declined in Amber Lake since 2001. However, there was a slight increase in numbers in 2022 with 6 per gill net and 18.7 per trap net. This slight increase in catch rate during the survey follows 2 commercial seine hauls done towards the beginning of March 2022, when over 1200 pounds per acre of Bigmouth Buffalo and Common Carp were removed. There may be an ability to continue to suppress the Common Carp population through exclusion of backwater spawning habitat and continued predator management including Muskie stocking. However, in 2012, the Fairmont Chain of Lakes was confirmed to have Yellow Bass. Yellow Bass were most likely introduced through illegal stocking. Since 2012, they have expanded in relative abundance in Hall, Budd, Sisseton, and George Lakes. During 2022, Yellow Bass were sampled for the first time in Amber Lake with 12 per gill net (0 per trap net). Several high water events in 2018 and 2019 could have led to an introduction of Yellow Bass into Amber Lake, with those fish not showing up in the summer 2018 netting. Overall, it appears that Amber Lake is maintaining an adequate abundance of Walleye, potentially increasing. Yellow Perch, however, appear to be decreasing and stocking may be necessary to sustain the population. Black Crappie and Bluegill are doing much better in Amber Lake and both could produce a decent fishery over the next several years. Habitat improvement projects could positively influence the fishery. There are options to allow trees that fall into the lake to stay and provide woody habitat for refuge or spawning. Get out and enjoy Amber Lake, a great opportunity awaits!
August 21, 2018Amber Lake is a 180 acre lake within the city of Fairmont in Martin County. Amber Lake is part of the "Fairmont Chain of Lakes". The Fairmont Chain of…
Amber Lake is a 180 acre lake within the city of Fairmont in Martin County. Amber Lake is part of the "Fairmont Chain of Lakes". The Fairmont Chain of Lakes (from headwaters to mouth) is comprised of Amber Lake, Hall Lake, Budd Lake, Sisseton Lake, and George Lake which are all natural impoundments of Center Creek in the Blue Earth River Watershed. Amber Lake is the deepest of the lakes with a large watershed of nearly 12,000 acres. The watershed has many factors that contribute to degraded conditions within Amber Lake. Agriculture and municipal sources of pollution are both present within the watershed. Many miles of agricultural tile move nutrient rich water to Amber Lake without wetland treatment and the city of Fairmont operates a storm water runoff system that empties into the Chain of Lakes. These are the same lakes that the city of Fairmont draws drinking water (Budd Lake directly downstream), so it is imperative to reduce negative influences of water impairments to improve the water quality in the Fairmont Chain of Lakes. Martin County Soil and Water Conservation District has taken the lead on creating a water plan for Martin County that includes the Fairmont Chain of Lakes and has implemented some projects that help reduce the effects of water quality impairments on the lake. One project that is yet to be done is within the Dutch Creek watershed that feeds Hall Lake just downstream. This project will restore a floodplain wetland that should have water quality benefits to Hall Lake and the other 3 lakes. Amber Lake will still require upstream improvements. Amber Lake is managed primarily for Walleye and Muskellunge while Black Crappie and Yellow Perch are managed secondarily. Fish population assessments have been conducted every 4 to 7 years since 1982 with an initial assessment conducted in 1971. A recent fish standard survey was conducted during the week of August 21, 2018 to analyze the current species composition in Amber Lake and to look for changes in the fish community. Fish community changes over time tell us a lot about the health of an aquatic environment. Since Walleye are the primary species of management, they are most important to track in Amber Lake. Since 1993, Walleye have been at or below the long-term gill net catch rate average of 3 per gillnet. In 2018, the catch rate was less than 1 per gillnet. The trap net catch rate was 1 per trap net. While those catch rates were low, the 10 Walleye in the sample were between 10 and 16 inches with balanced size distribution. Additionally, Walleye yearlings were stocked into Amber Lake in the fall which should boost the population. Amber Lake is stocked once every other year with additional Walleye added when available. Since the last lake survey in 2011, over 6,500 fingerling, yearling, or adult Walleye have been added to Amber Lake. That is just shy of 1,000 Walleye per year. This number is creating a low density Walleye fishery with a decent percentage of fish above harvestable size. Muskellunge have been managed in Amber Lake and the entire Fairmont Chain of Lakes since 2016. Muskie fingerling have been stocked in even years (2016 and 2018) with 314 fingerling in each year. No Muskies were sampled in netting, but reports from anglers indicate that the original stocking in 2016 was successful and Muskies near 25 inches have been reported. One mid-20's-inch Muskie was verified by fisheries staff in a photo. Continued Muskie management will help to add a consistent top predator to Amber Lake and the Fairmont Chain that had been sorely missing within the Chain of Lakes. Yellow Perch abundance has exhibited a similar trend as Walleye. The Yellow Perch abundance has been less than the long-term gill net catch rate of 18 since 1982 except 2011 when the catch rate was 39 per gill net. In 2018 the catch rate was 5.5 per gill net. The Yellow Perch in the sample ranged in length from 5.5 to 8 inches. Yellow Perch are not stock but instead are self-sustaining, potentially limited by habitat degradation due to decreased aquatic plant and woody debris abundance. Black Crappie have exhibited a different trend since 1987. Generally, the abundance of Black Crappie has increased. Since 1987, 5 out of 7 surveys have had Black Crappie abundance near or exceeding the long-term average of just under 20 per trap net. Black Crappie ranged in length from 8 to just over 10 inches with an average length of nearly 9 inches in the trap net sample. Overall, Black Crappie have done much better in the Fairmont Chain of Lakes over the past 10 years. Black Crappie are able to thrive in degraded aquatic systems and can spawn without aquatic vegetation or woody debris. Other species sampled in Amber Lake were Bigmouth Buffalo, Black Bullhead, Bluegill, Channel Catfish, Common Carp, Freshwater Drum, White Crappie, White Sucker, and Yellow Bullhead. These species, except for Bluegill, are typical residents of degraded aquatic lakes. Bluegill were stocked from a private source 2 times over the past 7 years (Fairmont Lakes Foundation provided funding for the fish and arranged the stocking). Channel Catfish and Freshwater Drum have been the most abundant of the species listed since the early 1990's. Increases in Channel Catfish and Freshwater Drum relative abundance can lead to competition with Walleye, Yellow Perch, and even Black Crappie. However, it appears that Walleye and Yellow Perch were the most affected. Interestingly, Common Carp abundance has decreased in Amber Lake since the 2001 survey. There may be an ability to continue to suppress the Common Carp population through exclusion of backwater spawning habitat, continued Bluegill presence in the lake, and long-term predator management including Muskies. However, in 2012, the Fairmont Chain of Lakes was confirmed to have Yellow Bass. Yellow Bass were most likely introduced through illegal stocking. Since 2012, they have expanded in relative abundance in Hall, Budd, Sisseton, and George Lakes. Currently, no Yellow Bass have been sampled in Amber Lake, but it is only a matter of time before they find their way into the lake. In 2018, several high water events could have led to an introduction of Yellow Bass into the lake, with those fish not showing up in the summer netting. The impact of Yellow Bass on the Fairmont Chain of Lakes has not been determined yet. Overall, it appears that Amber Lake is maintaining adequate to low abundances of Walleye and Yellow Perch. Black Crappie are doing much better in Amber Lake and could even produce a decent fishery over the next several years. Habitat improvement projects could boost the fishery. There should also be a focus on allowing trees that fall into the lake to stay in the lake (may need to be anchored to shore) for fish habitat. Best management practices for agriculture and city runoff could also improve conditions within Amber Lake. Currently, Amber Lake is sustaining an average fishery with degraded water quality and insufficient habitat. Prepared by Nate Hodgins
July 5, 2018Nearshore fish community sampling (hereafter IBI sampling; seine, backpack electrofishing) was conducted July 5, 2018 to assess the reproductive capac…
Nearshore fish community sampling (hereafter IBI sampling; seine, backpack electrofishing) was conducted July 5, 2018 to assess the reproductive capacity of the fish community and the overall health of the nearshore community in Amber Lake in Martin County. Backpack electrofishing and seining was conducted at 10, 100 ft. long stations around the perimeter of Amber Lake. The seine hauls captured 7 species of fish, including Johnny Darter (N=1), Bigmouth Buffalo (N=2), Fathead Minnow (N=11), Freshwater Drum (N=1), Orangespotted Sunfish (N=1), Bluegill (N=3), and Largemouth Bass (N=1). Electrofishing captured 10 species of fish including Johnny Darter (N=5), Bluegill (N=9), Common Carp (N=7), Fathead Minnow (N=8), Green Sunfish (N=2), Largemouth Bass (N=7), Orangespotted Sunfish (N=3), White Sucker (N=1), Yellow Bullhead (N=3), and Yellow Perch (N=1). Natural Reproduction exists for some of the species in Amber Lake, as young-of-the-year Freshwater Drum, Largemouth Bass, and Orangespotted Sunfish were sampled. The types of species and their respective abundances in nearshore IBI sampling will be used to determine the overall health of Amber Lake. The IBI score will provide insight into the quality of habitat and water within the lake and can indicate problems within the watershed that could adversely affect the fish community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What fish can you catch in Amber?
Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Channel Catfish, Walleye, Bluegill, Northern Pike, and Black Crappie in Amber. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.
Is there public access at Amber?
We don't have a confirmed public access point on record for Amber. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for current access details before you go.
How deep is Amber?
Amber has a maximum depth of 19 feet and a mean depth of 11 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.
When were the main sport fish in Amber last surveyed?
The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Amber is from 2022.
Does Amber have any invasive species?
No invasive species are on record for Amber in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.
More lakes in McLeod County
View all548 acres
Channel Catfish · White Crappie · Yellow Perch
461 acres
Channel Catfish · White Crappie · Walleye
156 acres
Channel Catfish · Walleye · Northern Pike
2,268 acres
Channel Catfish · Walleye · Yellow Perch
639 acres
Channel Catfish · White Crappie · Black Crappie
951 acres
Muskellunge · Northern Pike · White Crappie
Lake Details
- Surface Area
- 182.09 acres
- Max Depth
- 19 ft
- Mean Depth
- 11 ft
- Shoreline
- 2.2 mi
- Public Access
- Not confirmed