Skip to content
MN Fish Finder

Shady

Olmsted County
Near Oronoco
DOW: 55000500
Channel CatfishExcellent · 98White CrappieGood · 55Green SunfishGood · 53

A 144-acre lake near Oronoco in Olmsted County — best known for catfish and panfish. Last surveyed 1987.

Fish Species (13)

Channel Catfish

Excellent · 98

Above-normal numbers

Gill-net survey · surveyed Sep 1962

Last surveyed 1962 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.45 lbs

Catch rate: 5.0 per gill net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Sep 4, 19625.00-0.45 lbs

White Crappie

Good · 55

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.17 lbs

Catch rate: 11.6 per trap net · typical 2.5–11.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 198711.60-0.17 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.50-0.10 lbs
Sep 4, 196221.10-0.19 lbs

Green Sunfish

Good · 53

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Sep 1962

Last surveyed 1962 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.12 lbs

Catch rate: 1.2 per trap net · typical 0.2–2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Sep 4, 19621.20-0.12 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.50-0.10 lbs

Black Crappie

Average · 42

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.20 lbs

Catch rate: 4.2 per trap net · typical 2.4–15.1 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19874.20-0.20 lbs
Sep 4, 19621.50-0.07 lbs

Smallmouth Bass

Average · 40

Average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Sep 1962

Last surveyed 1962 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.50 lbs

Catch rate: 0.1 per trap net · typical 0.1–0.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Sep 4, 19620.10-0.50 lbs

Rock Bass

Average · 27

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Sep 1962

Last surveyed 1962 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.20 lbs

Catch rate: 0.1 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Sep 4, 19620.50-0.20 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.10-0.20 lbs

Bluegill

Average · 27

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.08 lbs

Catch rate: 2.0 per trap net · typical 1.9–29.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19872.00-0.08 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.10-0.10 lbs

Largemouth Bass

Poor · 18

Small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.18 lbs

Catch rate: 1.0 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19871.00-0.18 lbs
Other species in this lake (5)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

Common Carp

Good · 65

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.61 lbs

Catch rate: 7.0 per gill net · typical 0.3–4.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19877.00-0.61 lbs
Jul 9, 19873.60-1.44 lbs
Sep 4, 19628.40-1.02 lbs

White Sucker

Good · 55

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.31 lbs

Catch rate: 10.0 per gill net · typical 0.5–7.4 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 198710.00-0.31 lbs
Jul 9, 198737.60-0.32 lbs
Sep 4, 19622.00-0.25 lbs

Black Bullhead

Average · 46

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.32 lbs

Catch rate: 2.8 per trap net · typical 2.2–60.5 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19872.80-0.32 lbs
Sep 4, 19623.70-0.26 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.50-0.10 lbs

Yellow Bullhead

Poor · 18

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.30 lbs

Catch rate: 0.2 per trap net · typical 0.8–6.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19870.20-0.30 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.90-0.58 lbs

Shorthead Redhorse

Poor · 8

Small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 1987

Last surveyed 1987 — treat with caution

Avg Weight
0.25 lbs

Catch rate: 3.0 per trap net · typical 1.2–6.8 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 9, 19873.00-0.25 lbs
Sep 4, 19620.20-0.23 lbs

Biologist Notes

July 9, 1987Largemouth bass, black and white crappie and bluegill are well represented with several year classes present. Growth is poor for the area. The turbid…

Largemouth bass, black and white crappie and bluegill are well represented with several year classes present. Growth is poor for the area. The turbid conditions favor white crappie. Most of the gamefish are too small to be acceptable to anglers. Carp, white sucker, silver and shorthead redhorse are abundant. No channel catfish were collected during the 1987 survey despite yearling stockings which occurred in 1983, 1985 and 1986 in the two branches of the Middle Fork Zumbro River. Channel catfish were recorded in the 1962 survey. Contract commercial fishing was last conducted in 1982-83 with all fish taken being too small to market.

September 4, 1962Test netting of the lake revealed a predominance of rough fishes (quillback, white sucker, redhorse, channel catfish, and bullheads). White crappies w…

Test netting of the lake revealed a predominance of rough fishes (quillback, white sucker, redhorse, channel catfish, and bullheads). White crappies were taken in numbers that indicated a dense population, but black crappies were much less in proportion. Other fishes were few in number or absent.For reasons of light fishing pressure, shallow silty nature of lake, drawdowns, and the rough fish problem there seems little or no justification for stocking the lake with gamefish. If a fishery is desired, it would seem that crappies are best suited to cope with the rough fish and silty lake conditions. Large numbers of crappies presently exist and additional stocking seems unnecessary at this time.A variety of rough fish species inhabit the lake and removal would be a perennial and a never-ending task as it involves the whole of the Zumbro River Middle Branch system. Rough fish removal is not recommended because of the existing lake conditions.Over the years Lake Shady has been or has become seriously impaired by siltation, pollution, and water level drawdowns. The shallow lake serves as a settling basin for silt, sand, and debris which results from runoffs and erosion along the North and South Middle Branches of the Zumbro River. Pollution resulting from settlements along the river, such as Pine Island, have also undoubtably had some adverse effects. In addition, drawdowns as a flood control measure have not been conducive to stable water levels and good fisheries management. A major drawdown occurs every winter and lasts for a period of about 5 or 6 months. Other drawdowns of comparatively shorter periods occur in the summer.Better management of the lake for fishing, boating, and swimming is a very long and expensive task, if not an insurmountable one. At the present time the lake receives light fishing pressure and has a rough fish problem which has little chance of being adequately solved.Fisheries management of Lake Shady has little or no justification at the present time except on a very limited basis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Shady?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Channel Catfish, White Crappie, Green Sunfish, Black Crappie, and Smallmouth Bass in Shady. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Shady?

We don't have a confirmed public access point on record for Shady. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for current access details before you go.

How deep is Shady?

Shady has a maximum depth of 13 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Shady last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Shady is from 1987. Surveys this old should be treated with some caution — fish populations change over time.

Does Shady have any invasive species?

No invasive species are on record for Shady in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.

More lakes in Olmsted County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
144.17 acres
Max Depth
13 ft
Shoreline
9.16 mi
Public Access
Not confirmed
View on DNR LakeFinder

Location

44.1629°N, 92.5481°W

Get Directions