Skip to content
MN Fish Finder

Big Swan

Todd County
Near Burtrum
DOW: 77002300
WalleyeGood · 59Rock BassGood · 58Black CrappieAverage · 47

A 947-acre lake near Burtrum in Todd County — best known for walleye and panfish. Last surveyed 2025.

Fish Species (20)

Walleye

Good · 59

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2020

Avg Size
15.7"
Avg Weight
1.67 lbs

Catch rate: 6.3 per gill net · typical 3.3–8.8 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.0821.0"3.13 lbs
Apr 12, 20222.5821.0"3.65 lbs
Apr 12, 20224.2021.0"3.51 lbs

Rock Bass

Good · 58

Below-normal numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
7.0"
Avg Weight
0.43 lbs

Catch rate: 0.25 per trap net · typical 0.5–2.5 for a lake like this

Size of catchable rock bass67% keeper-size (8"+)
4–7" · 33%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.127.0"-
Jul 14, 20250.257.0"0.43 lbs
Apr 12, 20221.33--

Black Crappie

Average · 47

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2020

Avg Size
7.2"
Avg Weight
0.29 lbs

Catch rate: 5.8 per gill net · typical 0.4–2.7 for a lake like this

Size of catchable black crappie0% keeper-size (10"+)
5–9" · 100%Largest sampled 9"

Size from the Jul 2025 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20252.126.6"-
Jul 14, 20250.756.6"0.24 lbs
Jul 14, 20251.436.6"-

Largemouth Bass

Average · 46

Typical numbers

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Aug 2016

Last surveyed 2016 — treat with caution

Avg Size
14.2"
Avg Weight
2.32 lbs

Catch rate: 30.5 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 202537.5012.0"-
Jul 14, 20250.1712.0"1.63 lbs
Jul 14, 20255.7212.0"-

Pumpkinseed

Average · 29

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
4.6"
Avg Weight
0.19 lbs

Catch rate: 1.9 per trap net · typical 1.8–7.8 for a lake like this

Size of catchable pumpkinseed4% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 96%Largest sampled 9"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 202510.724.6"-
Jul 14, 202512.004.6"-
Jul 14, 20255.384.6"-

Bluegill

Average · 28

Typical numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
4.2"
Avg Weight
0.10 lbs

Catch rate: 17.9 per trap net · typical 4.4–49 for a lake like this

Size of catchable bluegill2% keeper-size (8"+)
3–7" · 98%Largest sampled 8"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 202517.924.2"0.10 lbs
Jul 14, 202567.214.2"-
Jul 14, 202579.504.2"-

Northern Pike

Average · 26

Above-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2020

Avg Size
20.9"
Avg Weight
2.19 lbs

Catch rate: 8.9 per gill net · typical 2.8–9 for a lake like this

Size of catchable northern pike0% keeper-size (24"+)
14–23" · 100%Largest sampled 22"

Size from the Jul 2025 survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.2517.4"-
Jul 14, 20250.6717.4"1.18 lbs
Apr 12, 20226.0021.5"1.97 lbs

Hybrid Sunfish

Poor · 18

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
8.5"
Avg Weight
0.63 lbs

Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.178.5"0.63 lbs
Jul 14, 202518.598.5"-
Apr 12, 20220.33--

Green Sunfish

Poor · 17

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
4.0"
Avg Weight
0.07 lbs

Catch rate: 0.17 per trap net · typical 0.2–1 for a lake like this

Size of catchable green sunfish0% keeper-size (7"+)
3–6" · 100%Largest sampled 4"
Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20251.504.0"-
Jul 14, 20256.004.0"-
Jul 14, 20250.174.0"0.07 lbs

Yellow Perch

Poor · 14

Below-normal numbers · small fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2020

Avg Size
5.5"
Avg Weight
0.07 lbs

Catch rate: 0.58 per gill net · typical 7–46.3 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 202524.755.0"-
Jul 14, 20250.085.0"0.07 lbs
Jul 14, 20254.005.0"-
Other species in this lake (10)

Rough fish, bullheads, and baitfish recorded in DNR surveys — present in the lake, but not typical angling targets.

Yellow Bullhead

Good · 64

Typical numbers · large fish

Trap-net survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Avg Size
11.8"
Avg Weight
1.28 lbs

Catch rate: 1.7 per trap net · typical 1.2–5.2 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.7111.8"-
Jul 14, 20251.6711.8"1.28 lbs
Apr 12, 20220.42--

White Sucker

Average · 49

Typical numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2020

Avg Size
15.9"
Avg Weight
1.81 lbs

Catch rate: 1.7 per gill net · typical 0.9–4 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Apr 12, 20220.17--
Jul 20, 20201.6715.9"1.81 lbs
Aug 1, 20160.4218.6"2.92 lbs

Common Carp

Average · 31

Below-normal numbers · average-size fish

Gill-net survey · surveyed Jul 2004

Last surveyed 2004 — treat with caution

Avg Size
21.0"
Avg Weight
4.65 lbs

Catch rate: 0.08 per gill net · typical 0.2–1 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.1729.5"12.12 lbs
Apr 12, 20220.80--
Aug 1, 20160.29--

Brown Bullhead

Poor · 17

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Mar 2017

Last surveyed 2017 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 0.13 per trap net · typical 0.3–1.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Apr 12, 20220.08--
Jul 20, 20203.0812.7"1.27 lbs
Mar 20, 20170.13--

Black Bullhead

Poor · 4

Below-normal numbers

Trap-net survey · surveyed Apr 2011

Last surveyed 2011 — treat with caution

Catch rate: 0.03 per trap net · typical 0.3–2.6 for a lake like this

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Apr 6, 20110.03--
Apr 8, 20090.11--
Mar 26, 20070.01--

Golden Shiner

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Catch rate: 3.5 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20253.50--
Jul 14, 20250.75--
Jul 14, 20250.71--

Bluntnose Minnow

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Catch rate: 3.0 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20253.00--
Jul 14, 202533.62--
Jul 14, 20250.71--

Fathead Minnow

Insufficient

Electrofishing survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Catch rate: 2.1 · Electrofishing survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20252.14--

Johnny Darter

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Catch rate: 0.5 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.50--
Jul 30, 20123.55--
Jul 30, 20120.10--

Iowa Darter

Insufficient

Seining survey · surveyed Jul 2025

Catch rate: 0.5 · Seining survey

Survey History
DateCatch RateAvg LengthAvg Weight
Jul 14, 20250.50--
Jul 30, 20121.18--
Jul 30, 20120.40--

Biologist Notes

July 14, 2025A targeted survey of nearshore fish species in Big Swan Lake was conducted on July 14- 16, 2025, by Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessment Program…

A targeted survey of nearshore fish species in Big Swan Lake was conducted on July 14- 16, 2025, by Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessment Program (LBMA) staff. Sampling sites were evenly spaced around the lake, and each was sampled by backpack electrofishing and seining with a 50-foot or 15-foot seine, where possible. Backpack electrofishing was completed at 14 sampling stations. Similarly, a 50-foot seine was used to sample eight stations, and a 15-foot seine was used at two stations. Four stations were not seined due to deep water and soft substrate. Nearshore sampling captured 27 species of fish including eight species that are intolerant of disturbance (i.e., Banded Killifish, Blackchin Shiner, Blacknose Shiner, Iowa Darter, Least Darter, Logperch, Pugnose Shiner, and Rock Bass) and two that are tolerant of disturbance (i.e., Fathead Minnow and Green Sunfish). A concurrent summer trap net survey was also conducted by LBMA staff. Twelve trap nets were set along the shoreline in locations that encompassed multiple habitat types. Trap net sampling captured 12 species of fish, including one that is intolerant of disturbance (i.e., Rock Bass) and two species that are tolerant of disturbance (i.e., Common Carp and Green Sunfish). Bluegill comprised a majority of the catch by number, whereas Yellow Bullhead and Common Carp comprised a majority by biomass. The nearshore and trap net data were combined with gill net data from a July 2024 survey to describe the fish community and provide a fish-based IBI (FIBI) score. The FIBI uses fish community data to measure a lake's health, and the types of fish species present can help identify any stressors that may be negatively affecting the lake environment. In Minnesota lakes, certain fish species cannot survive without clean water and a healthy habitat (e.g., Blackchin Shiner, Iowa Darter, and Rock Bass), while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions (e.g., Green Sunfish and Common Carp). The FIBI score, composed of several fish community diversity and composition metrics, indicates the overall health of a lake by comparing it to what is expected for a healthy lake. For additional information on the FIBI search for "lake index of biological integrity" on the mndnr.gov website. Results from this survey provide evidence that the fish community in Big Swan Lake is healthy as indicated by an FIBI score above the general use impairment threshold for aquatic life use determined for similar lakes. These results are similar to previous findings, which indicated that Big Swan Lake is fully supporting aquatic life. The survey results will be considered when the biological health of the lake is assessed during the Mississippi River Brainerd watershed assessment process, which will be completed in coordination with the MN Pollution Control Agency. You can help protect the fish community in Big Swan Lake by reducing runoff, maintaining natural shorelines, and preventing the spread of invasive species.

August 15, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Big Swan Lake on August 15th, 2024, to evaluate the quanti…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Big Swan Lake on August 15th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 44.9 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 21.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 26.6 feet at the time of sampling. The thickness of this layer of water in the water column was 5.6 feet, indicating that oxythermal habitat was present for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 20.9 degrees C (69.6 degrees F). TDO3 values near than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were present, but marginal for Cisco at the time of the survey. However, data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 4 years, between 1981-2016, indicate unsuitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2016 when the suitable oxythermal habitat layer was 0 feet thick. Additionally, 5 surveys completed outside of the period of maximum oxythermal stress (i.e., 1986, 1991, 1996, 2000, and 2020) also indicated unsuitable oxythermal habitat. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

August 15, 2024Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Big Swan Lake on August 15th, 2024, to evaluate the quanti…

Temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements were collected from the deepest basin in Big Swan Lake on August 15th, 2024, to evaluate the quantity and quality of cold, oxygenated water (i.e., oxythermal habitat) available to Cisco, also known as Tullibee, the most sensitive coldwater species present in this lake. During the summer, Cisco require a layer of oxythermal habitat that contains water temperatures below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) and dissolved oxygen concentrations above 3.0 mg/L. Based on the profile from the deepest basin (maximum sampled depth 44.9 feet), the water temperature decreased below 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) at 21.0 feet and the dissolved oxygen concentration decreased to 3.0 mg/L at 26.6 feet at the time of sampling. The thickness of this layer of water in the water column was 5.6 feet, indicating that oxythermal habitat was present for Cisco. Further, the temperature at which dissolved oxygen decreased to 3.0 mg/L (i.e., TDO3, a single variable to characterize oxythermal habitat) was 20.9 degrees C (69.6 degrees F). TDO3 values near than 21.2 degrees C (70.2 degrees F) indicate that oxythermal conditions were present, but marginal for Cisco at the time of the survey. However, data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources during the late summer period of maximum oxythermal stress (July 26th to Aug 24th) in 4 years, between 1981-2016, indicate unsuitable oxythermal habitat in most years when surveyed, with the least favorable conditions recorded in 2016 when the suitable oxythermal habitat layer was 0 feet thick. Additionally, 5 surveys completed outside of the period of maximum oxythermal stress (i.e., 1986, 1991, 1996, 2000, and 2020) also indicated unsuitable oxythermal habitat. When inadequate oxythermal habitat is available, Cisco are squeezed into unfavorable, warmer water conditions and experience higher levels of stress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What fish can you catch in Big Swan?

Based on Minnesota DNR survey data, anglers target Walleye, Rock Bass, Black Crappie, Largemouth Bass, and Pumpkinseed in Big Swan. See the full species list above for catch rates, size structure, and quality scores.

Is there public access at Big Swan?

Minnesota DNR records list public access for Big Swan. Check the DNR LakeFinder page for the launch type and directions before you go.

How deep is Big Swan?

Big Swan has a maximum depth of 45 feet and a mean depth of 18 feet, per Minnesota DNR data.

When were the main sport fish in Big Swan last surveyed?

The most recent Minnesota DNR survey data for the main sport fish in Big Swan is from 2025.

Does Big Swan have any invasive species?

No invasive species are on record for Big Swan in Minnesota DNR data. Always clean, drain, and dry your equipment to help keep it that way.

More lakes in Todd County

View all

Lake Details

Surface Area
946.56 acres
Max Depth
45 ft
Mean Depth
18 ft
Shoreline
7.77 mi
Public Access
Yes
View on DNR LakeFinder

Location

45.8881°N, 94.7499°W

Get Directions